Breaking India Indian Muslims Dalits Hate Watch Minorities Law Science & Technology Education

Politics

Tahir Hussain, Four Others Get Life Imprisonment for Murder of IB Officer Ankit Sharma During 2020 Delhi Riots

Supreme Court Grants Custodial Parole to Tahir Hussain for Delhi Poll Campaign Amid Severe Restrictions

By The Observer Post
|
On January 28, 2025

“Muslim-dominated areas in Delhi lack basic amenities, creating ‘ghettos,'” says SPECT Foundation report

By The Observer Post
|
On January 27, 2025

Opposition Criticizes “Draconian” Waqf Bill, Vows to Challenge in Supreme Court

By The Observer Post
|
On January 27, 2025
AIMIM president and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi has opposed the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026, after it was passed by Parliament. He argued that making the singing of Vande Mataram mandatory violates the constitutional right to freedom of religion. Speaking after the Bill's passage, Owaisi said that as a Muslim, he worships only Allah and cannot perform any act that goes against his religious beliefs. “I am a Muslim, and I worship no one except Allah. If I worship anyone else, I will be acting against my religion,” Owaisi said. Owaisi distinguishes between Jana Gana Mana and Vande Mataram Explaining his opposition, Owaisi said there is a clear difference between the national anthem, Jana Gana Mana, and Vande Mataram. According to him, Jana Gana Mana reflects respect for the nation and its people, whereas Vande Mataram contains elements of devotion to a goddess. “When Jana Gana Mana is sung, it reflects respect for the country and its people. Vande Mataram, however, contains elements of worship of deities. The two are different in nature and cannot be treated as the same,” he said. Questions raised over national song status Owaisi also questioned the status of Vande Mataram as the national song. He claimed that former President Rajendra Prasad made a mistake in 1950 by recognising Vande Mataram as the national song. He argued that no formal resolution was passed by Parliament on the issue and said the Constitution does not explicitly define the term "national song." Cites constitutional provisions The AIMIM leader alleged that the amendment infringes upon the rights guaranteed under Articles 25, 26 and 29 of the Constitution, which protect religious freedom and cultural rights. He maintained that no citizen can be compelled to perform an act that conflicts with their religious beliefs.

Owaisi Rejects Waqf Board Amendment Bill, Calls It “Undemocratic”

By The Observer Post
|
On January 27, 2025

Telangana: Dalit Man Found Dead, Father Alleges ‘Honour Killing’ Over Inter-Caste Marriage

By The Observer Post
|
On January 27, 2025
Waqf Amendment Bill

Waqf Amendment Bill Mandates Non-Muslim Representation in State and National Councils

By The Observer Post
|
On January 27, 2025

Muslim Entrepreneurs in Gujarat Slam Government’s ‘Discriminatory’ License Cancellations

By The Observer Post
|
On January 25, 2025
loudspeaker mosque

“Religious places are for prayer, not loudspeakers,” Allahabad HC rules in mosque case

By The Observer Post
|
On January 24, 2025
Mehbooba Mufti

“Using education as a propaganda tool is unacceptable,” says PDP on mandatory student participation in ABVP rally

By The Observer Post
|
On January 24, 2025
Waqf Amendment Bill

“We felt humiliated and raised our voice democratically,” say suspended MPs in protest over Waqf Bill proceedings

By The Observer Post
|
On January 24, 2025
Previous Next
the observer post

The Observer Post is an independent media outlet dedicated to highlighting stories of the marginalized, including Dalits, Tribals, Women, and Minorities.

Categories

Breaking Human Rights Minorities Dalits

Quick Links

About Us Contact Us Disclaimer Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Follow Us On Social Media
Get Latest Update On Social Media
Join Now

© theobserverpost.com • All rights reserved