Breaking India Indian Muslims Dalits Hate Watch Minorities Law Science & Technology Education

India

MP: Dalit Man Beaten to Death Over Dispute Of Denial Of Food in Mhow

By The Observer Post
|
On December 21, 2023

“Should I Say I’m Not Allowed to Speak Because I’m a Dalit?” Kharge Challenges Caste-Infused Debates

By The Observer Post
|
On December 21, 2023

‘Mosques Raised After Temple Destruction Won’t Be Spared”: K’taka BJP leader Eshwarappa

By The Observer Post
|
On December 21, 2023

Lok Sabha Passes Bills to Replace IPC, CRPC, and Indian Evidence Act

By The Observer Post
|
On December 20, 2023
AIMIM president and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi has opposed the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026, after it was passed by Parliament. He argued that making the singing of Vande Mataram mandatory violates the constitutional right to freedom of religion. Speaking after the Bill's passage, Owaisi said that as a Muslim, he worships only Allah and cannot perform any act that goes against his religious beliefs. “I am a Muslim, and I worship no one except Allah. If I worship anyone else, I will be acting against my religion,” Owaisi said. Owaisi distinguishes between Jana Gana Mana and Vande Mataram Explaining his opposition, Owaisi said there is a clear difference between the national anthem, Jana Gana Mana, and Vande Mataram. According to him, Jana Gana Mana reflects respect for the nation and its people, whereas Vande Mataram contains elements of devotion to a goddess. “When Jana Gana Mana is sung, it reflects respect for the country and its people. Vande Mataram, however, contains elements of worship of deities. The two are different in nature and cannot be treated as the same,” he said. Questions raised over national song status Owaisi also questioned the status of Vande Mataram as the national song. He claimed that former President Rajendra Prasad made a mistake in 1950 by recognising Vande Mataram as the national song. He argued that no formal resolution was passed by Parliament on the issue and said the Constitution does not explicitly define the term "national song." Cites constitutional provisions The AIMIM leader alleged that the amendment infringes upon the rights guaranteed under Articles 25, 26 and 29 of the Constitution, which protect religious freedom and cultural rights. He maintained that no citizen can be compelled to perform an act that conflicts with their religious beliefs.

New Criminal Bills Threaten Rights of Dalits, Muslims, and Adivasis: Asaduddin Owaisi in Lok Sabha

By The Observer Post
|
On December 20, 2023

K’taka: Hindutva Groups Warn Of Staging Protests If Muslim Businesses Permitted Near Temple During Makar Sankranti Fair 

By The Observer Post
|
On December 20, 2023

“Will always support Hindus who…”: Dutch PM Candidate Geert Wilders Thanks Indian ‘Supporters’

By The Observer Post
|
On December 20, 2023

Opposition Accuses PM Modi and BJP of Orchestrating ‘Single Party Rule’ Amidst Suspension of 141 MPs

By The Observer Post
|
On December 20, 2023
Modi Netanyahu India

PM Modi and Netanyahu Discuss Ongoing Gaza Crisis On ‘Productive’ Phone Call

By The Observer Post
|
On December 20, 2023

Islam And Christianity Top Enemies of Hinduism: Swami Sachchidanand in Noida

By The Observer Post
|
On December 19, 2023
Previous Next
the observer post

The Observer Post is an independent media outlet dedicated to highlighting stories of the marginalized, including Dalits, Tribals, Women, and Minorities.

Categories

Breaking Human Rights Minorities Dalits

Quick Links

About Us Contact Us Disclaimer Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Follow Us On Social Media
Get Latest Update On Social Media
Join Now

© theobserverpost.com • All rights reserved