Skip to content

Home
India
World
Politics
Features
Video
Opinion
Support Us

Breaking India Indian Muslims Dalits Hate Watch Minorities Law Science & Technology Education

Supreme Court

Supreme Court to Hear Plea Challenging UPI Transaction Fee on Payments Above Rs 2,000

By The Observer Post

|

On September 27, 2026

‘State-Sanctioned Violence’: Amnesty Accuses Indian Police of Excessive Force During Youth Protests

Supreme Court Says Pellet Guns Cannot Be Banned Under Existing Rules, Seeks RAF Ammunition Log

By The Observer Post

|

On July 30, 2026

Supreme Court Questions Umar Khalid Bail Verdict, Says ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Exception’ Even in UAPA Cases

Supreme Court Questions Umar Khalid Bail Verdict, Says ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Exception’ Even in UAPA Cases

By The Observer Post

|

On May 18, 2026

Supreme Court

“Don’t Hollow Out Religion in Name of Reform”: Supreme Court Observes in Sabarimala Case Hearing

By The Observer Post

|

On April 15, 2026

SC Refuses to Hear PIL Seeking Removal of Nazia Elahi Khan's Remarks on Prophet Muhammad, Says Follow Existing Legal Remedies

Supreme Court Denies Interim Relief to West Bengal Voters Removed in SIR Exercise

By The Observer Post

|

On April 13, 2026

Supreme Court India

Supreme Court Rules Dalits Lose SC Status After Converting to Islam or Christianity

By The Observer Post

|

On March 25, 2026

Supreme Court advocate Dr. Saif Mahmood reports an Ola driver in Delhi glorifying violence against Muslim passengers. The driver has been suspended, but concerns over passenger safety remain.

“He Boasted About Beating Muslims”: Supreme Court Advocate Alleges Ola Driver Threatened Passengers, Glorified Violence in Delhi Ride

By The Observer Post

|

On March 18, 2026

Budaun Court Convicts Sakir Hussain in Kidnapping, Rape and Forced Religious Conversion Case; Sentenced to 10 Years in Jail

Only 3.89% SC, 2% ST and 12.25% OBC Judges Appointed to High Courts Since 2018; Women Just 3% in Supreme Court

By The Observer Post

|

On March 13, 2026

Supreme Court Stays Forcible Exhumation of Tribal Christian Graves in Chhattisgarh

Supreme Court of India Bans NCERT Class 8 Textbook Chapter on ‘Judicial Corruption’, Orders Seizure of Copies

By The Observer Post

|

On February 26, 2026

Supreme Court India

Supreme Court Declines Plea to Stop Naming Religious Structures After Babur

By The Observer Post

|

On February 21, 2026

1 2 3 4 … 6

Next

---Advertisement---

Latest News

VHP Accuses Congress, Opposition of ‘Conspiring’ Against Hindu Festivals

VHP Accuses Congress, Opposition of ‘Conspiring’ Against Hindu Festivals

October 27, 2026

BJP Demands Farooq Abdullah’s Arrest for Saying Pakistan Is ‘Protecting Kashmiris’

BJP Demands Farooq Abdullah’s Arrest for Saying Pakistan Is ‘Protecting Kashmiris’

October 27, 2026

IISER Pune Removes Umar Khalid’s Book, Cites Concerns Over ‘Unrest’

IISER Pune Removes Umar Khalid’s Book, Cites Concerns Over ‘Unrest’

October 27, 2026

The Calcutta High Court has barred the publication and circulation of a documentary alleging close ties between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and industrialist Gautam Adani until January 31, 2027, or until further orders. The interim injunction was issued on Monday by Justice Aryak Dutt after Adani Enterprises Limited filed a defamation suit against tech entrepreneur Sabeer Bhatia and others, seeking damages and a ban on the video’s circulation. Titled The Friendship Files: How Modi and Adani Stole India, the 36 minute video essay was uploaded to Bhatia’s YouTube channel, Bcubed, on October 9. It was also shared on X and other social media platforms. The court restrained the respondents, including YouTube, X and Instagram, from publishing, reuploading, sharing or otherwise distributing the video. The restriction also covers clips, excerpts, shortened versions and substantially identical reproductions of the content. Court Calls Video a Dramatised Narrative In its order, the court said the documentary was not a news report or an account of proceedings but a dramatised narrative that presented its allegations through narration and visuals as factual. The bench observed that the title itself insinuated theft and contained allegations against the Adani Group that had not been substantiated by any authority. While acknowledging that pretrial injunctions in defamation cases involving matters of public interest must be granted cautiously, the court said it was of the prima facie view that the case fell within an exceptional category warranting such relief. The court directed the respondents to remove the video and any clips or reproductions containing the allegedly defamatory statements from accounts, channels and pages under their control. It also ordered social media platforms to block access to the video at the URLs identified in Adani Enterprises’ petition and disable reposts, quote posts, shares and other engagements through which the content remained accessible. However, the court clarified that its order did not prohibit constructive criticism or fair reporting on the Adani Group or government policies, provided such content did not involve the video, its reproductions or the allegedly defamatory statements identified in the case. Social Media Platforms Asked to Preserve Records YouTube, X and Instagram have been directed to preserve subscriber and registration details, internet protocol logs recorded at the time of upload, and access logs linked to the accounts and URLs mentioned in the petition. The platforms must also submit basic subscriber information for accounts whose owners cannot be identified, through affidavits in a sealed cover within two weeks of receiving the order. The court further directed the platforms to stop serving advertisements on the specified URLs or sharing revenue generated from the video. They were also asked to preserve records of any advertising revenue earned from the content. The petitioner told the court that access to the original YouTube upload had been disabled in India, apparently following a government complaint under the Information Technology Rules, 2021. However, it alleged that the video continued to circulate through other YouTube channels, X accounts and Instagram Reels. Adani Enterprises’ counsel argued that the video contained false allegations against the company and that the right to reputation was an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution. The court directed the respondents to file their replies within four weeks of receiving the petition. Adani Enterprises has been given another two weeks to respond. The matter is scheduled to be heard by the regular bench in January. Sabeer Bhatia Values His Reputation at Zero Reacting to the lawsuit, Bhatia said on social media that Adani Enterprises had valued the alleged damage to its reputation at Rs 50 crore, but he considered the value to be zero. “I contend that wealth acquired through alleged wrongdoing does not confer credibility or reputation,” Bhatia wrote. “My valuation of that reputation? Rs 0. And if the reputational damage is zero, the compensation should be zero,” he added. “Rs 50 crore demanded. Rs 0 deserved,” Bhatia said. Raj Thackeray Says He Deleted Video After Police Request Meanwhile, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray said he had removed the documentary from his social media accounts following a request from the Mumbai police commissioner. His statement came days after Mumbai Police issued legal notices to X users who had shared the video. MNS leaders questioned whether the police had faced pressure to make the request. Thackeray claimed that the video had received more than 48 lakh views on X and said he had shared it to inform the public. He also said he had been raising concerns about the relationship between Modi and Adani since January 2026, before the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation elections. “The Mumbai and Maharashtra Police are the most efficient police force in the country, and I have always had respect for them in my heart. I am just honouring the request made by the head of such a Mumbai Police,” he wrote on X.

Calcutta High Court Bars Circulation of Modi and Adani Documentary Until January 31, 2027

October 27, 2026

Owaisi’s UP Poll Bid May Help BJP by Splitting Votes, Says Ramdev

Owaisi’s UP Poll Bid May Help BJP by Splitting Votes, Says Ramdev

October 27, 2026

The Observer Post is an independent media outlet dedicated to highlighting stories of the marginalized, including Dalits, Tribals, Women, and Minorities.

Categories

Breaking Human Rights Minorities Dalits

Quick Links

About Us Contact Us Disclaimer Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Follow Us On Social Media

Get Latest Update On Social Media

© theobserverpost.com • All rights reserved

Home
India
World
Politics
Features
Video
Opinion
Support Us

Search for: