Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

India

SC: Journalists Should Not Face Criminal Charges Merely Because Their Writings Are Perceived as Government Criticism

SC: Journalists Should Not Face Criminal Charges Merely Because Their Writings Are Perceived as Government Criticism
Indian journalists protest assault on fellow media workers at a court in New Delhi on February 17, 2016. Feature Image source: Asia society

 The Supreme Court on Friday observed that criminal cases should not be slapped against journalists merely because their writings have been perceived as government criticism.

The bench was hearing a plea filed by journalist Abhishek Upadhyay, who has sought quashing of an FIR lodged against him in Uttar Pradesh for allegedly publishing a news report on the “caste dynamics of the general administration” in the state.

As per the report  by The Hindu,  Abhishek Upadhyay, represented by advocate Anoop Prakash Awasthi, said the article saw the Uttar Pradesh Police register a “frivolous” FIR against him under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita and Section 66 (computer-related offenses) of the Information Technology Act.

The  journalist, in his petition, said the very prelude of the FIR “compares the current Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh as incarnation of God and hence immune from any critical analysis of the caste dynamics in his general administration”.

The petition said a “journalist’s duty is to serve the truth, to hold power accountable, and to inform the public without fear or favour”.

 Awasthi read the contents of the FIR in court to argue that no offence could be said to be made out. He apprehended that since the story was posted on X (earlier Twitter), it might result in multiple other FIRs.

Mr. Upadhyay said, besides lodging of the current FIR, he had also received threats of legal action from the official X handle of the Uttar Pradesh Police in reply to his post to acting Director General of Police and continuously getting threats of arrest and even encounter killing.

“Freedom of speech is the most precious right given in our Constitution for a healthy and participatory democracy,” the petition said.

“Merely because writings of a journalist are perceived as criticism of the government, criminal cases should not be slapped against the writer,” the bench said.

A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti said in democratic nations, the freedom to express one’s views is respected and the rights of journalists are protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

While issuing a notice to the Uttar Pradesh government seeking its response on the plea, it said, “In the meantime, coercive steps should not be taken against the petitioner in connection with the subject article.” The court posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.

You May Also Like

India

Veteran BJP leader and former National Council member N. Sivarajan has sparked outrage after saying that India’s national flag should be replaced with a...

Human Rights

Saifur Rahman, Convenor of Cogito Media Foundation (CMF), has strongly condemned the 90-day ban imposed on the YouTube channel of Journo Mirror for publishing...

India

Former General Secretary of the Popular Front of India, Abdul Sathar from Palakkad, Kerala, secures bail from the Supreme Court after he was arrested...

Human Rights

The Cogito Media Foundation has raised serious concern over the Indian government’s recent actions against independent digital media. Its president, Shams Tabrez Qasmi, said...

Copyright © 2025 The Observer Post. All Rights Reserved.