Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Human Rights

‘High-Handed Action by UP Government’: Supreme Court Slams Illegal Demolition, Orders Rs 25 Lakh Compensation

File Photo

The Supreme Court on Wednesday strongly criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for the illegal demolition of a house, describing the action as “high-handed.” The court ordered the state to pay the homeowner Rs 25 lakh in compensation within a month. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, leading the bench, questioned how the government could demolish a house without following proper legal procedures or providing prior notice.

The case involved a petitioner whose house was demolished without notice or explanation, supposedly for encroaching on a highway. The petitioner argued that the demolition was retaliatory, occurring after he raised concerns about irregularities in road construction in a newspaper report.

“The petitioner states the demolition was only because the petitioner had flagged irregularities in road construction in a newspaper report,” the court said. “Such action by the state cannot be countenanced and when dealing with private property, law has to be followed.”

The bench also pointed out that the Uttar Pradesh government failed to provide evidence of the original width of the highway or specific details of the alleged encroachment before carrying out the demolition. The court directed the government to first establish the road’s proper width, issue formal notices if encroachments were found, and allow residents to submit objections. If objections were rejected, the government was ordered to issue a “reasoned order” and provide sufficient time for residents to vacate or remove alleged encroachments.

The court also ordered an inquiry by the state’s chief secretary into the incident and instructed disciplinary action against any officials involved in the unlawful demolition, including those who may have caused similar harm to others in the area.

“This will include disciplinary action against any officer who demolished not only house of petitioner but anybody else who met the same fate in the area,” the court added.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Indian Muslims

The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the 2004 Uttar Pradesh Board of Madrassa Education Act, giving relief to madrassas in the state....

Education

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 2004 Uttar Pradesh Board of Madrassa Education Law, overturning a previous Allahabad High Court ruling...

Human Rights

Imran Khan, the editor of the local newspaper Aap Abhi Tak, was arrested on November 2 for allegedly publishing a defamatory story against Bharatiya...

Indian Muslims

By Abu Saif Shaikh Muslims in India are facing constant atrocities from the state, and what is alarming is that average Indians are normalizing...

Copyright © 2023 The Observer Post. All Rights Reserved.